Skip to main content

How to Teaching Writing the Right Way (Hint: It's Not with Grit)

The importance of learning how to read and write well has been established as a vital part of surviving in America today. If you aren't determined to be literate "enough," you're likely to be cast aside as a less-than-functional member of society. Besides its function as a way communicate, literacy is tied up in advocacy, wealth and class structure. As Cadeiro-Kaplan points out, this is a kind of cultural capital that's inextricably linked to a predetermined privilege. Comparing this with the Radical Eyes for Equity piece, it further validates that grit is a bunk concept. 

I felt almost stupefied when I read about the deficit ideology. Our brains (or at least mine) have been so programmed to think that we're operating from the ideal "100," A+ starting point. By illustrating the material that was missed by writing something on a paper like, "100-30 = 70" the teacher really does devalue the work that may have taken hours for some students but days or weeks for others to learn. I remember the embarrassment I felt after getting a test back with that same grading at the top of a paper in red ink. I can only imagine what it must feel like for a student who repeatedly has to see that. 

The readings are again blending in to what I'm reading in some other classes. I'm certainly not complaining about that, though! This week, I can't help but think about my Postcolonial Lit class and how education relates to colonization/imperialism and the erasure of cultural identity in favor of a prescribed cultural literacy. As Cadeiro-Kaplan points out, literacy just seems to be a way to "serve the interests of maintaining the industrial social order." Sounds a little drone-like, no? 

Comments


  1. Hi Alyssa,
    I definitely share your feelings about the deficit ideology and the reading really opened my eyes to just how discouraging and negative that type of grading is. In all my years of schooling (with the exception of a few college classes) this is exactly how I remember being graded and truthfully I never stopped to consider the implications the author notes. Do you think there is any hope of changing things now, especially when that is the only grading system most teachers (and students) have ever known?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

MTV's Decoded and Privilege, Power and Difference

It was nice to have a change of medium to analyze and think about this week- and I started off our assignment by watching the YouTube video from MTV's Decoded series on Microaggressions. I've seen some snippets of this series before and have also noticed that MTV's made a push to get issues like racism, sexism, and privilege in front of its viewers. I think the way this particular topic was approached was quite smart. Its use of comedy deftly showed the very unfunny realities of everyday racist comments and observations made by people of privilege. Moreover, because it's only a 2-minute snippet, you can imagine that this barely scratches the surface of what oppressed people experience due to their race, gender, orientation or religion. While I personally am not a fan of MTV (The Dead Kennedys predicted that they would produce swill  and sugarcoated musicians back in the 80s) as don't forget, this is coming from the same network that spawned shows like The Jersey S...

Teaching Writing in the Era of Accountability

Since embarking on my path towards becoming an English teacher, I've both read and heard an unsettling amount of talk around the daunting standards, testing mandates, and overall bureaucracy now involved with teaching. I've seen the disillusionment and jadedness it's created, especially with more seasoned teachers. It's even been suggested by some teachers not to pursue the profession because of how much it's changed. To address this issue, the writer in "To High School English Teachers (and All Teachers)" stressed that "our planning and practice must start with our students’ literacy being sacred—seeking ways to foster eager readers and writers who still must often demonstrate literacy proficiency in the worst possible settings. This is not a call to be negligent, but to be dedicated to the power of literacy first and bureaucracy second." That statement serves as a good reminder to call ourselves back to the reason why we're teaching ...